Wilmington University
Nicole Hatcher
Practicum III SEA
Purpose
|
Strengths
|
Weaknesses
|
Appropriateness
|
|
Slosson Intelligence Test
|
To give a quick screening of an individual’s general intelligence
|
It can be given to a large age range (4-65) and covers a variety of
areas
|
It does not give an in-depth look at abilities
|
It may not be an appropriate tool to assess reading level since it is
so general
|
Slosson Oral Reading Test
|
A quick look at word recognition
|
It can assess a student’s progress
|
It does not measure all aspects of reading
|
Should be used as a screening tool but not a definitive assessment
|
Basic Reading Inventory
|
To find a student’s instructional level for reading
|
Offers a variety of methods to insure accuracy
|
Can be time consuming
|
Gives a more detailed area of instruction to focus on
|
Wepman’s Auditory Discrimination Test
|
To test a child’s ability to discriminate small differences between
phonemes
|
It hones in on a specific issue that a child may be having
|
It is intended for children ages 4-8, leaving a large population out
of the testing range
|
A screening tool used to narrow down the possible reading issues a
child is having
|
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills
|
Tests a student’s ability to decipher the black and white lines that
make up text
|
Can determine if a student’s reading issue comes from a visual
perceptual issue
|
Can be quite lengthy at 25 minutes
|
Would probably be used after ruling out other issues
|
There
are many different factors that go into a person’s ability to read. With each
type of assessment the person giving the assessment has to decide if it is the
right one for that particular student and their situation. Each assessment has
their strengths and weaknesses for any given type of situation.
Intelligence
tests seem to be on the down side of popularity. The Slosson Intelligence Test
does not give an in-depth look at a student’s abilities and the outcome can
change drastically depending on a student’s mood and motivation for that day.
When it is compared to the Basic Reading Inventory it seems a bit more
stressful on the student as well. The Basic Reading Inventory is set up so that
students are not pushed passed their frustration point. It is clearly written
in the directions that once a student reaches their frustration level the test
should be ended. The whole point of the BRI is to learn the student’s
instructional level while the SIT could possibly be damaging to a student’s
confidence.
Wepman’s
Auditory Discrimination Test seems to be a bit of a more intense screening than
the Slosson Oral Reading Test. The SORT looks at a child’s general ability to
recognize words while the WADT looks at the student’s ability to decipher small
differences. SORT would be used to decipher if a child is having a problem in
general while it seems like the WADT would be used to rule out a specific
problem of deciphering phonemes.
The
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills is the most specific test on the list. It also
seems like it is a conclusive test as in one that is given after one of the
screening tests is given. Just as there are many factors that go into reading
there are many factors that need to be tested when there is an issue with
reading. By having so many tests ready and available schools can over their
students the best chance at developing a plan to combat whichever issue the
student is having.
Works
Cited
Academic Therapy Publications.
(2013). Retrieved from http://www.academictherapy.com/detailATP.tpl?eqskudatarq=8409-5
Center For Psychological Studies.
(2014). Slosson Intelligence Test.
Retrieved from http://www.cps.nova.edu/~cpphelp/SIT.html
---.(2014). Slosson Oral Reading Test. Retrieved from http://cps.nova.edu/~cpphelp/SORT.html
Encyclopedia of Children’s Health.
(2014). Auditory Discrimination Test.
Retrieved from http://www.healthofchildren.com/A/Auditory-Discrimination-Test.html
Johns, Jerry L. (2012). Basic Reading Inventory. Dubuque:
Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.